![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://news.yahoo.com/mike-mcqueary-gives-first-public-account-saw-sandusky-183709474.html
Frankly, this makes me physically ill. Someone sees a young boy being sexually victimized and does NOTHING about it except to tell their supervisor at some unspecified later date?
Who the FUCK can see something like that happening and not immediately step in and at least try to stop it?
That's it, human race, I'm done.
Frankly, this makes me physically ill. Someone sees a young boy being sexually victimized and does NOTHING about it except to tell their supervisor at some unspecified later date?
Who the FUCK can see something like that happening and not immediately step in and at least try to stop it?
That's it, human race, I'm done.
no subject
Date: 12/16/11 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/16/11 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/16/11 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/16/11 11:08 pm (UTC)But that brings me to the second thought.
Maybe this isn't an exact version of what the guy saw, if he saw much of anything. Maybe he's embellishing because enough has come out about Sandusky that he wants to see the guy put away. ... And that's wrong in a whole different way if so.
Say you hear these allegations, and all of a sudden that glimpse you got in the shower was more in your mind than them just being a little too close together, you know?
I think there's enough evidence to bury Sandusky as this thing goes, but were I his defense, that's the angle I'd pursue.
no subject
Date: 12/17/11 12:18 am (UTC)Most peoples' embellishments put themselves in more positive lights.
no subject
Date: 12/17/11 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/17/11 12:25 am (UTC)However, all speculation on my part, of course.