![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
BAH ICK UGH POO
Aside from the obvious answer (he can't because he doesn't have an original bone in his body) why doesn't Quentin Pinkerton Tarantino make a film that's not a direct rip-off of an obscure film he hopes no-one's heard of?
OK, maybe they're "FUN" as a friend of mine suggests, but what would you think of a painter whose entire body of work was copying other paintings?
What would you think of that painter being praised to the skies while the painters of the original (and arguably better) works languished in obscurity?
So, here's my challenge to QPT; prove me wrong by making a really good, really original film that isn't wholly based on some other film you've watched. Pick a book that no-one's filmed yet, and make THAT.
C'mon, I DARE ya
OK, maybe they're "FUN" as a friend of mine suggests, but what would you think of a painter whose entire body of work was copying other paintings?
What would you think of that painter being praised to the skies while the painters of the original (and arguably better) works languished in obscurity?
So, here's my challenge to QPT; prove me wrong by making a really good, really original film that isn't wholly based on some other film you've watched. Pick a book that no-one's filmed yet, and make THAT.
C'mon, I DARE ya
no subject